I’m the blogger in question. Some time ago, when I was still under the illusion that the Occupy movement was capable of adopting serious political goals and developing a coherent revolutionary approach, I wrote a plan for a democratic attack on the City of London Corporation. Shortly afterwards, I wrote a more detailed account of what hurdles would have to be overcome for a mass voter registration scheme in the City of London. Via Facebook, Stephen R Moore contacted me and asked if he could act upon the idea. Of course, I had no objections.
Recently, I discovered that a website called Occupy City of London Corporation had republished the entirety of one of the posts linked to above (I forget which). Sure, they had given me a link, but I did think that copying the entire post was a bit cheeky. So I got in touch with them. Thus Mr R Moore contacted me via Facebook again and we had what I thought was a polite conversation. During that chat, I politely asked him if he would remove my text and made it clear that I was not making an “hard demands”. Next thing I know, he was is warning me to “beware”. Here’s the whole conversation – click on the image below to enlarge it.
Why, exactly, should I “beware”? What sort of person is this, who first scrapes content written by someone else, then claims it wasn’t published (when it was) and, finally, warns off the polite blogger by telling him to beware? I look forward to hearing about whether there will be a mass voter registration scheme made successful in the City of London Corporation. However, I doubt very much that someone with this aggressive attitude can be relied upon to maintain the long term alliances necessary for political action.
Mr R Moore, I just browsed through your Facebook wall, before cancelling our “friendship”. Was a bit surprised with what I found there. You’re no ordinary progressive political activist are you? Certainly, you don’t seem to have a problem with our cultural proclivity for the objectification of women. Here’s a picture you shared.
Dream on, buddy. There were various pictures of women on your Facebook Wall. These were not pictures which referred to the awesome role played by the women of Tahrir Square. They were not pictures which showed women in a positive light. Do these pictures reveal your attitude to women, Mr R Moore?
Okay, it’s a funny image, perhaps. Actually, I think the humour here is weak. However, taken together with all the images of women shown from a sexual point of view, it rather looks like Mr R Moore posted it on his Facebook wall because he likes images which objectify women. Here’s another one.
All of this raises once again, the ugly side of Occupy. Without any form of structure or coherent policies around which they are united, there seems to be no desire to exclude people like Stephen R Moore. People who warn others to “beware”, for no apparent reason. People who routinely post pictures of women which highlight their sexual ‘function’ above all others. Whilst there are a number of estimable individuals involved in Occupy, sadly there are too many people like Stephen R Moore. This is not the first time I’ve been warned off. The trouble is, it isn’t even clear what I’ve been warned off this time!




Duncan, you really are nasty, sick and twisted.
The website that you are so offended by was, as I said in my apology, in development and wasn’t meant for public consumption at the time.
As I said in my apology, be warned.
You seem to have taken this as a go ahead to attack me personally. (You think you’re the first person my humour has offended? LULZ) So consider yourself blocked from me and any City of London project that I am involved with. You are too unstable.
People warned me that you have people skills and mental issues, but always tried to treat you as would like to be treated myself. Even though you were particularly nasty, with no apparent reason, to me and others in the legal team for St Paul’s.
Plus it is S R Moore, R Moore is my dad.
Yet you refer to yourself, even in this comment as “Stephen R Moore”. I don’t believe I have ever spoken to you or even about you before today, nor published anything either. These people you refer to, who are they? I’ve justified everything I’ve published here. Point to a post you say is without reason?
The sad fact is that as a political movement goes, Occupy is immature to the point of being puerile. Any criticism whatsoever and its all guns blazing. I suggest you read the published thread again, when you’ve calmed down perhaps? You’ll not find any demand from me, quite the opposite.
As for blocking me from any particular page inside the walled garden of Facebook, oh dear, my heart bleeds. The page you refer to was notable for having no intellectual or organisational development whatsoever. I prefer the open web to employing proprietary systems which make millions for shareholders. But, hey, you’re the edgy activist remember? You’re the fellow who liked someone else’s idea so much you’ve been working on it for months now *in secret*. Made much progress? I look forward to seeing some results. Although, if you’re elected… *shudders*
This is some of the most desperate shit I’ve ever read.