Category Archives: Green Party

Pioneering ‘no eviction’ proposals become Green Council policy

This is the Brighton & Hove Green Party’s official press release on the no-evictions policy:

Green-led councillors in Brighton & Hove yesterday fulfilled the party’s pledge to introduce a policy saying that no city council tenant should be evicted from a council-owned home just because they cannot afford to pay their bedroom tax.

Brighton & Hove was the first city in the country to see such a declaration and yesterday afternoon it continued to lead the way on bedroom tax evictions when its plans become council policy.

It is two months since the housing committee chair, councillor Liz Wakefield, made a commitment to introduce the policy, describing the so-called ‘spare room subsidy’, or bedroom tax, as “immoral and harmful legislation from this morality-free coalition government“.

In her final meeting as chair of the committee, before the post moves on, councillor Wakefield saw the commitment fulfilled when fellow councillor Phélim Mac Cafferty proposed the Green’s no eviction policy, which was seconded by all Green councillors present and then approved unanimously by the Green, Labour and Conservative councillors serving on the committee.

The policy ensures that the council may continue to use all usual means to pursue non-payment other than bailiffs or evictions.

Councillor Wakefield said:

“The Green council is proud to lead the way in fighting the bedroom tax and pleased to make it clear to our council tenants that we will not send the bailiffs round to evict them solely because they are unable to pay the coalition government’s unjust, unscrupulous and often unaffordable bedroom tax.”

Councillor Mac Cafferty said:

“The bedroom tax is one of the cruellest components of a cruel coalition attack on the poorest and most vulnerable people. As Greens, we could not stand by while people might face eviction as a result, so we’ve taken a national lead with this new council policy. We urge other councils to join us and make this government’s plans unworkable.”

Caroline Lucas MP added:

“I congratulate councillor colleagues on taking such a principled stand against this heartless government policy which is both immoral and unworkable.”

Speaking for the Brighton & Hove Green Party, chair Rob Shepherd concluded:

“This is a radical policy from a radical party, telling the coalition government it cannot have its own way on bedroom tax and welfare restructuring. And it’s a policy that offers reassurance to many council tenants across the city at a time when they desperately need it. No other party would have brought such a relief to Brighton & Hove residents.”

The policy takes immediate effect.

Jason Kitcat responds to the Green Party’s policy on pay modernisation

This is the official press release from Brighton & Hove Green Party on the pay restructuring proposals for Brighton & Hove City Council staff:

A meeting of the Brighton & Hove Green Party earlier this week overwhelmingly agreed that it could not support any Brighton & Hove City Council pay offer now being made that would leave staff worse off.

The council’s pay offer, which it suggests will affect about 10% of staff, varies from employee to employee, so each offer is now being individually communicated to staff members by their managers during a 90 day ‘staff consultation’.

Hundreds of staff face a drop in take home pay, offset by one-off, lump-sum compensation packages; the council has stated that, as a result of allowance changes and the compensation, some affected staff will be better off while others have to decide whether they feel the compensation is enough to offset their overall loss. This is an individual decision.

Much play has been made on social media that individuals may lose up to £95/week, or more than £4,000 a year. However, unofficial sources have recently revealed that a reduction of that level applies to just three employees and does not take into account their compensation package, which is worth about three years’ losses.

Most staff face lower reductions and lower compensation, generally worth between two and three years of loss, sometimes a little more.

The complete picture is not this simple but it seems clear that once the compensation is gone, low paid staff will be living on even lower weekly take home pay. This has angered staff and it’s unacceptable to the Brighton & Hove Green Party, which has resolved to campaign against it.

BHGP chair Rob Shepherd said:

“The party’s made it clear it cannot support a final offer that appears to leave council staff with a cut in their consolidated take home pay. These include some of the city’s lowest paid workers and we understand how they must be feeling.

“We recognise that the offer particularly benefits women who, it seems, have not been treated fairly under the existing payment structure. It goes without saying that women should be paid the same as men in comparable situations and we support creating a fair and gender-balanced pay structure. But it is not right if low paid people of either sex end up with a loss of income to achieve that balance.

“We’re also disappointed with the council administration’s decision to delegate pay negotiations entirely to council officers, meaning the administration now has no say in what’s being proposed. This is a council offer, not a BH Greens offer. If there are pay cuts on the table, they are not in our name.

“We hope that, as a result of the party’s intervention, the Green administration will find a way to take back control of the process and ensure the council will look again at any offers that result in consolidated pay losses.”

Green MP Caroline Lucas said:

“Since the negotiations began, I have made my opposition to any cuts in take home pay very clear.

“I am therefore disappointed that, whilst some will gain from this process, a number will face a reduction in the money they have to live off each week.

“This is unacceptable. I know from the many constituents who have written to me about this issue that they agree.

“So too does the Brighton and Hove Green Party, whose members have voted to condemn the offer and also express dismay that responsibility for the pay negotiations was handed to council officers.

“With the support of the local Green Party, I have pledged to campaign against proposals made to workers that will lead to a loss of pay, in accordance with the local and national party’s democratically agreed anti-cuts and anti-austerity policies.”

Rob Shepherd added:

“We also condemn the city’s Labour and Conservative parties for creating the mess that the council is seeking to manage. They are quick to criticise the Green administration yet they created the problem.

“Going back decades, both parties have presided over agreements which look blatantly unfair to some parts of the workforce and especially women. Both parties permitted what look like unethical, unequal deals. And both parties were warned time and again by council officers that they needed to sort it out but they bottled it in fear of industrial disputes.

“Whatever the current state of the pay offer, it is utterly hypocritical of Labour and Conservatives to say anything other than ‘sorry’.”

“However, it’s more important that all politicians now pull together in the interests of some of the city’s lowest paid workers. These people must be at the heart of whatever we do.”

Responding to the party’s decision, council leader Jason Kitcat said:

“I very much understand and sympathise with the concerns expressed in the local party motion.

“Members of council staff have just received the council’s offer to create a fair and clear system of allowances which completes the final step of the ‘single status’ process. There is now a 90 day consultation period for staff to consider the offer, how it will affect them and respond to their managers with their views.

“I believe it is important to not prejudge that consultation, how staff may consider the proposals, nor any negotiations which I hope will follow.

“During this consultation period I am confident that the council continues to be open to any suggestions from staff and unions that could further improve the offer whilst ensuring it remains legally and financially viable.”

Green MP supports Cityclean staff against Green Council

This morning Caroline Lucas, the Green MP for Brighton Pavilion attended the Hollingdean depot, currently occupied by workers who are taking wildcat strike action against Brighton & Hove City Council, to support their battle against pay cuts which the Council officers wish to impose on them. She was accompanied by Mike Jones, a Green Councillor in Preston Park ward.

Caroline Lucas MP at the Hollingdean depot of Cityclean, 9th May 2013

Caroline Lucas supports the Cityclean staff. Click to enlarge.

These workers have decided to reject the compensation package on offer. Although the City Council is administered by the Green Party, the local party overwhelmingly voted to support the Cityclean staff in their dispute. The Council Leader, Jason Kitcat refuses to acknowledge either local or national party policy on pay cuts. Consequently, plans are being prepared by several of his colleagues to force him out of his job. That might mean them bringing down the administration of the Council. One councillor, Mike Jones has declared that he will leave the Green Group on the Council if the pay cuts are imposed.

Caroline Lucas MP and striking Cityclean staff, 9th May 2013

Caroline Lucas MP and striking Cityclean staff

To call this situation a disaster for the Green Party is quite an understatement. If it is not resolved very quickly to the satisfaction of those opposing any pay cuts, it is likely to be the end of the Green Party. It will haemorrhage members and it’s electoral support will be set back a generation, which will effectively kill the party.

Today should have been a good news day for the Brighton & Hove Green Party because the Council became the first in the country to declare that there would be no evictions if any of its social tenants got into arrears as a result of the so-called bedroom tax. That story could have captured national headlines. Instead, the main story in the City is about the Greens fighting one another.

The Greens are different from other parties. Most of its members and many of its elected representatives prefer to do the right thing rather than just hold onto power at all costs. I’ve been asked to draft a proposal to expel Jason Kitcat from the Party ~ I’ll be working on that today.

The time has come for every member of the Green Party administration in Brighton & Hove to ask themselves which side of this dispute they really want to be on?

The master of the blame game: Jason Kitcat

Following Tuesday’s extraordinary general meeting of Brighton & Hove Green Party, which decided to support the local Council’s lowest paid workers in their official dispute with their employer, the Council Leader Jason Kitcat has gone to ground. He’s ignored a flurry of communications inside the local Green Party’s internal systems, he’s failed to respond to text messages, emails have gone unanswered. Possibly, he’s been struck down by a sudden illness? Whatever it is, it didn’t prevent him from tweeting.

In the 36 hours since his party overwhelmingly voted against his approach to pay modernisation in the city, Mr Kitcat’s strategy has been to blame others. With considerable justification he blamed previous Labour and Tory administrations for allowing a labyrinthine pay structure to develop. Inside the party he has repeatedly refused to indicate what he considers the risks of allowing that pay structure to continue. This is the most illuminating remark he’s ever made on the topic:

Jason Kitcat tweets about cataclysms

Is that a bible I see in your hand?

He has repeatedly told Green Party members that to even talk about the reasons for the risk of a cataclysm will actually cause it to happen. He has repeatedly hidden behind the old get-out, “legal reasons.” This phrase is usually employed by journalists too lazy to explain law to their audience. “We cannot name the child for legal reasons,” is quicker than saying, “We cannot name the child because of the law protects the anonymity of children in legal matters and the judge has made a specific ruling in this case.” In the case of journalists, that’s fair enough, clearly they don’t have enough web space or TV air time to explain anything much. In the case of Mr Kitcat, the notion that him discussing legal threats against the Council or the risk of legal threats will somehow undermine the Council’s ability to defend those threats is completely specious.

Besides, the risks are well known. Briefly, they stem from the fact that staff are all paid different amounts for similar work. Since some jobs are carried out almost exclusively by men and some by women, this means that there can be claims of indirect discrimination, which employment tribunals would be only too happy to hear. The example of Birmingham City Council has been bandied about. In Birmingham, the Council faces a bill to settle the claims which is so large that it would be threatened with bankruptcy, were it not for the fact that it has large assets. It is expected to sell off some biggies, such as the NEC, to meet the payments.

Brighton & Hove City Council also has enormous assets. How much is the Royal Pavilion worth? It is the only Royal palace in the country which is owned by the people but there’s no reason why it couldn’t be owned by a private company. That is but one example.

Previous administrations tried to sort out the problematic pay structure but failed. Instead of showing political backbone, the present Green administration decided to adopt a new approach. It simply handed the whole process over to council officers. Thus, Mr Kitcat washed his hands of responsibility.

The morning after the local Green Party voted to campaign with the GMB against their own administration, a wildcat strike began amongst the city’s refuse collectors and street cleaners. The workers occupied their canteen. The Council hired scabs to do the work instead. Refuse began to pile up. Chaos is a word much loved by tabloid newspapers too lazy explain anything much but it is perhaps an appropriate summary of the situation. It as if there truly are two worlds, the real world and the paper world. We all live in the real world, with rubbish and recycling piling up, with a Green council hiring scabs, with a Green Council Leader apparently going rogue on his own party, with elected politicians turning to technocrats before a crisis. Mr Kitcat seems to live in the paper world, where none of these things matter, where so long as a procedure is followed everything will be fine, where the poisonous rag of the Brighton Argus is essential reading for the man about town. Here he is in conversation on twitter with @yokelbear, a much respected trades union activist from Hove. As with all of these images, click on them if you want a larger, clearer version to read more easily.

Jason Kitcat tweeting to a trades union activist in Brighton & Hove, contradicting him about whether chaos reigns

A clear case of denial

Here he is dealing with a straight forward request from the local Labour Party, who ask why he tweets rather than meet the striking workers in person. It’s a straight question and very easy to answer. Instead he fired off a link to a Brighton Argus story which talked about a strike by “bin men” in 2004:

Jason Kitcat tweets to Brighton & Hove Labour Party, comparing himself to their leader of 8 years previous

Finger pointing skills: 8/10, Political credibility: 0/10

Here he is again blaming Labour for his problem. The link in the tweet from Labour below goes to a statement which is barely longer than a tweet and says virtually nothing. It isn’t addressed to Mr Kitcat. He could have safely ignored it but, wait a minute, here’s another opportunity to blame someone else!

Jason Kitcat tweets blame to Labour leader Gill Mitchell

Jason Kitcat tries to finger Gill Mitchell

To be fair, that thread did continue with Mr Kitcat conceding that he was responsible for the process created by the Council officers:

Jason Kitcat tweets an admission that he is leader of Brighton & Hove City Council

Glimpse of reality

The complexity of the pay structures has arisen because of the way Brighton & Hove City Council came into being. Essentially, two local authorities, with differing pay structures merged but left the already complicated salary arrangements intact. No-one disputes that. The dispute is about whether this should be sorted out by elected, accountable politicians or by officers who don’t have to face political consequences for their actions. Since Mr Kitcat’s administration has chosen let the technocrats take over, we Greens find ourselves in the absurd position of being in the same party as an administration which plans to cut the pay of the lowest paid workers.

This is intolerable. Plans are afoot to remove Jason Kitcat as Council Leader. A rebellion is being planned amongst those Green Councillors who wish to remain loyal to their party’s clear policy. Watch this space for further details.

Brighton & Hove Green Party speaks out against Jason Kitcat’s pay negotiation strategy

The text after this italicised introduction is a resolution was passed by Brighton & Hove Green Party yesterday evening by 57 votes to 26, with 3 abstentions. In the pub after the meeting, I asked the Party Chair, Rob Shepherd, whether he had any objections to me publishing the resolution passed and he said he did not object. Previously, when he was in charge of external communications (presently he is party chair and responsible for external communications) he had asked me to delay publication of party business until he had issued an official press release.

The resolution below calls for the Green Group to instruct a particular barrister for advice. During the debate, a point was raised about the cost to the Green Group on the council. However, this is a specious point. Clearly, the Green Group currently form the administration of Brighton & Hove City Council. Therefore, the resolution calls on, in effect, the Green Group to instruct this particular barrister as the administration of the Council. Therefore, it will be Brighton & Hove City Council which instructs the named barrister, rather than the Green Group councillors.

I proposed the amendment which included this barrister’s name. I did that because it was obvious to me that there was a real risk of a conflict of interest with the lawyers originally named, who are a firm of solicitors retained by the TUC. I was not involved in the drafting of the original resolution. I voted for the amended version. There was another amendment, by Caroline Lucas MP, which was aimed to prevent party disunity; it involved the removal of some text in the resolution, which some thought to be particularly inflammatory. She voted for the resolution and spoke passionately in favour of it. Here’s the amended resolution, which was passed by the majority mentioned above:

Brighton and Hove Green Party is extremely concerned at the following communication from the GMB to the Council Pay Negotiations team:

“Based on the information we have been given verbally today, it still shows that members of ours will still lose between £5 and £95/ week, which is the same condition that the Council presented to the Unions at the beginning of these negotiations. In particular, the area that gets hit the most is 260 plus employees working in CityClean, which is the entire workforce. Today your negotiators confirmed that the make up agreement we currently have is being withdrawn, this alone is a loss of £1840 per person in the Refuse service and recycling. Also, the City Clean agreement, which was signed 2009 after the last dispute, your negotiators will not confirm if this is remaining or not. We can only take from their silence on this its matter that they will do, which will see a further £2000 cut per annum out of our members pay. Finally, shift allowance, in the case of street sweepers, one of the lowest paid in the Council, will have their annual salary cut by 25%. Plus all the other information received by your negotiators today, in regards to the way overtime is paid outside normal contractual arrangement and also a refusal to extend special schools allowance to mainstream schools where TAs are supporting those with special needs, it is with regret I have to inform you that GMB is now in an official dispute with the Council”.

On the basis of this and currently available information, Brighton and Hove Green Party:

1.    Expresses its dismay that responsibility for the strategy, direction and outcomes of these crucial pay negotiations was delegated from the Green Group (GG) to Council officers, with no provision to bring back final offers and outcomes to the GG for approval before they were submitted to the unions.

2.    Condemns what appears to be the final offer to the unions that will mean a cut to the real terms, consolidated take home pay of many Brighton and Hove Council employees.

3.    Supports the publicly stated position of Caroline Lucas MP that she opposes any cut to the basic take home pay of Brighton and Hove Council employees.

4. Asks that the GG now immediately take back control and direction of the pay negotiations with council unions, to examine the final offer that has been made and to revise it to ensure there is no pay detriment.

5.    As part of that process, asks the GG to immediately seek legal advice from Daniel Barnett of Outer Temple Chambers, London, under the Public Access Rules, on the best practical and legal means to resolve whatever equal pay issues are involved in the negotiations whilst at the same time ensuring that council staff do not suffer a real terms pay cut to their consolidated take home pay.

6.    Dissents from and condemns any outcome or final pay offer that leaves council staff with a real terms pay cut to their consolidated take home pay.

7. States that if any such offer or outcome occurs, we will campaign with the unions against it, in accordance with the local and national party’s democratically agreed anti-cuts and anti- austerity policies.

Detailed version of Brighton & Hove City Council’s pay offer to its staff

Earlier this morning, I published an email which was sent out to the staff of Brighton & Hove City Council. Here is the more detailed version, which the staff could only access through their own intranet. I have reformatted it a little to make it readable in this post but I have not altered the text one bit. The typographical errors were all in the original document.

Pay and Allowances Modernisation: The Employer Offer May 2013

CONTENTS

Introduction
Why we have reviewed this?
This sets out the rationale for the changes
Consultation and communication with our workforce
This sets out our the reasons for consulting you
Target Implementation Date
This is when the council would like the new set of allowances and expenses to take effect
Employees in Scope
Who we are consulting and who is the new set of allowances and expenses would apply to
Brighton & Hove City Council’s proposals
This sets out in detail all the proposals for the new set of allowances and expenses
Managing a reduction in contractual pay or expenses
The proposals for compensating those who would suffer a loss of pay or travel/car expenses as a result of accepting a new contract of employment
Pension Protections
This explains a process that some employees could use to protect their pension
Existing Protection Arrangements
This explains what happens to employees already in receipt of formal salary protection under our Organisation Change Management Framework
Job Families
This explains what Job Families are and how work on this is being progressed.
What can I do now to understand what the impact may be?
There are some examples to help you work out how the proposals may impact on you.
What happens now?
How you raise queries and provide feedback.
Questions and Answers

Introduction

The pay, terms and expenses of employees of Brighton & Hove City Council come from a number of different sources.

  • Key terms and expenses such as pension rights and entitlement to sick pay are agreed nationally by the employers’ organisation and trade unions.
  • basic pay grades are set by the council’s job evaluation and grading system which was implemented in January 2010; and the rates of pay are set in accordance with nationally agreed pay scales.
  • Annual increases to basic pay are agreed nationally but the council has made a local commitment to a minimum living wage of £7.45 per hour.
  • In addition, a significant number of staff receive allowances and additional payments because of the nature and pattern of the work that they do. Over time the current system has become complex, is based on historic requirements, costly to administer and is no longer fit for purpose. The rates for allowances are now set by the council, after negotiation with the recognised trades unions.

The council started negotiations with its recognised trade unions, GMB and Unison, in February 2013, with the aim of seeking agreement on a new set of allowances that is fair, consistent, modern and transparent.

The negotiations have not been about making savings on the council’s pay bill but about finding the best fit that minimises any potential loss for individual staff and ensures fairness and consistency across the workforce.

This document sets out the details of Brighton & Hove City Council’s proposals for
the payment of allowances payable in addition to basic pay to enable employees to:

a) assess the impact of the proposals for them; and
b) provide feedback as part of the consultation process.

Why we have reviewed this?

The council wants to have a fair and easily understood pay system that is consistent and transparent and fit for the council’s business purposes.

We implemented the outcome of the grading review after carrying out an objective job evaluation study for employees on national joint council (NJC) terms and conditions of employment. This set out basic salary grades for posts.

The grades were introduced on 1 January 2010 and we committed then to reviewing all payments made in addition to the basic salary.

The current negotiations with the council’s recognised trade unions, have taken place with an aim to achieve a best fit and minimise the amount of any loss.

We tried to ensure that the proposals are affordable and enable us to continue to attract and retain high calibre staff, so we can continue to provide good public services at the times our customers and clients expect.

Consultation and communication with our workforce

We have been negotiating with our recognised trade unions, GMB and Unison since February.

While we have not been able to reach an agreement on an allowances package with the unions, we have agreed that we have reached a stage in the negotiations where it is appropriate to consult the workforce.

So we are now setting out the current proposals directly to you, so you can see what the impact of the proposed allowance structure may be on to you, to provide clarity and provide and seek information.

We will consult for a period of 90 days, then we will meet the unions again to consider the outcome of the consultation and to establish whether we can reach an agreement with the unions on the final package of allowances and expenses.

The process of consultation means that we may alter some aspects of the offer, as a result of the feedback we have had; but the main elements are unlikely to change significantly prior to implementation.

You will continue to receive information during the consultation period and if you are likely to see a change to your current payments, you will be sent individual information and be offered a one to one meeting with your manager

GMB and Unison will also wish to communicate about the proposals to their members and will be available to take feedback or clarify issues.

Copies of all management communications (excluding individual letters with personal details) will be made available to the trade unions.

Target Implementation Date

We are seeking, through negotiation with GMB and Unison, to agree and implement a new package for the payment of allowances in addition to basic pay.

The target date for this new package to take effect is 1 October 2013.

Employees in Scope

The proposals apply to:

  • all employees with contracts of employment, who are on NJC (Green Book) terms and conditions, including those in community schools; and
  • those who TUPE’d in on different contracts of employment but should be moved onto NJC terms and conditions.

How do I know how I am affected

If your working patterns mean you work hours outside of Monday – Friday 8am – 6pm, or if you are in receipt of an allowance in addition to basic pay, you are likely to be affected by the proposals in some way.

If you are in receipt of any car or travel payments or claim business mileage you will also be affected by the proposals.

Brighton & Hove City Council proposals for payment of Allowance and Expenses

The following set of allowances and expenses, in addition to basic pay and the rates specified, are those which the council is proposing to introduce.

These are the only allowances that will be paid and therefore, if you are currently in receipt of an allowance or expense not listed, it is proposed that this will be removed.

1. Working Arrangements

For the purpose of allowances the following definitions apply:

  • Full time hours are 37 hours per week over 52 weeks per year
  • The standard working week operates Monday to Friday 6.00am to 8.00pm
  • A night is defined as 8.00pm to 6:00am
  • Normal working pattern is an individual’s normal contractual working arrangements

2. Enhancements for Non-standard Working Arrangements

These allowances will be paid to employees on spinal column point (scp) 28 and below (ie up to Scale 6) where their normal working pattern goes beyond the standard working week.

Saturdays and Sundays

Half time in addition to the normal hourly rate.

Bank Holidays

Plain time in addition to the normal hourly rate plus a day off or Double time in addition to the normal hourly rate

Night Work

Third time in addition to the normal hourly rate for any hours worked between
8.00pm and 6.00am.

For employees above scp 28 the rules governing entitlement to the allowances for non-standard working arrangements are set out below.

  • employees who are working in services which operate beyond the standard week, and are contracted to undertake regular work outside the standard week, will be entitled to claim enhancements for non standard working arrangements.
  • staff working ad-hoc hours outside of the standard week will not be entitled to enhancements for non-standard working arrangements but will be granted time off in lieu or may be granted overtime subject to the conditions set out in section 3 below.

3. Overtime

Employees graded Scale 1/2 to Scale 6 (up to scp 28) will be required, on occasions, to work additional hours.

  • Overtime (ie additional hours for part-time staff) up to and including 37 hours per week will be paid at plain time.
  • Overtime in excess of 37 hours per week will be paid as follows: Monday to Sunday – half time in addition to normal hourly rate; Bank Holidays – plain time in addition to the normal hourly rate

Employees graded SO1/2 to M8 will be required, on occasions, to work additional hours as the needs of the job dictate. Such overtime working will not normally qualify for additional payment but compensatory time off will be allowed by arrangement with management. Payment may only be payable by exception, as agreed by an executive director and in circumstances where compensatory time off may not be accommodated.

Employees graded Scale M7 or above are required to work such reasonable additional hours as are necessary to ensure the efficient and effective discharge of their duties. Some compensatory time off may be agreed with the line manager.

4. Standby, Call Out and Sleep-In Duties

Standby

Standby is payable where an employee is required to be available to work to work in order to deal with emergency situations as and when they arise. The payment will be made regardless of whether the employee is called upon to work.

Payment is not made when an employee is not available to work, for example, annual leave or sickness.

Employees who are contractually required to undertake standby duties will receive £26.50 per duty. If they are called out then after the first thirty minutes they will be paid for any additional hours. This is paid at the overtime rate if this takes the individual beyond 37 hours or the relevant working pattern enhancement in line with the time of day/week that the call-out takes place.

The standby payment represents a period of standby for up to 24 hours.

Exceptions

Winter-Gritting standby and rates will remain as they are currently with a week’s standby at £59.53. Payments for the work undertaken when called out will be as follows:

  • Hill Top Grit
  • Standard Grit
  • Full Grit

Call Out

Employees may occasionally be contacted outside of the normal working hours. This type of arrangement would not attract a standby payment as there is no contractual requirement to be available. The post holder would however receive payment for the hours worked in line with overtime and additional hours payments.

Sleep in Duty

Employees undertaking sleep-in duties will receive £32.94 per duty. Where employees are woken from sleep they will be paid at the relevant rate (night rate) after the first thirty minutes.

Standby and sleep-in rates will be reviewed each year in line with NJC rates.

5. Part-Time Employees

The allowances set out above will be applied to part-time employees in the
same way as they are applied to full-time employees, unless specifically stated.

6. Travel Expenses

Authorised business mileage will be paid in accordance with Her Majesty’s Revenue and Custom (HMRC) rates.

Brighton & Hove City Council's proposed travel expenses, 7th May 2013

Passenger payments

This is paid at the rate of 5p per passenger per business mile, for carrying employees in a car or van on official work journeys.

Approved journeys using public transport will be reimbursed subject to proof
of expenditure.

We will be retaining the current support schemes for travel:

a. City car club
b. Travel warrants
c. Season ticket loans
d. Cycle to work scheme

7. Excess Travel Expenses

Excess Travel will be paid to employees whose work location changes as a result of redeployment or an office move. Employees will be reimbursed the additional public transport expenses they incur beyond £5.00 a week for a period of a year.

This £5.00 threshold does not apply to employees on scp 17 or below.

8. Subsistence Expenses

Subsistence may be claimed only in relation to approved overnight stays outside of Brighton & Hove City Council boundaries.

The maximum amounts are reviewed each year in line with the NJC pay award and the rates with effect from 1 April 2012 are:

  • Breakfast £6.70
  • Lunch £9.21
  • Evening Meal £11.43

It should be remembered that these rates are not allowances. Reimbursement is limited to actual expenditure incurred, providing that the maximum amounts are not exceeded. A claim may not be made in respect of any item without the appropriate receipt.

9. Miscellaneous Payments for Temporary Additional Duties

Any payment for a period of acting up or additional duties will be paid in accordance with the council’s acting up and ex-gratia/honorarium policies.

10. Special Schools Allowance

Those staff working in special schools will continue to receive an allowance to reflect the additional challenges associated with working in that environment.

11. Market Supplements

Market supplements are paid where a shortage of skills in a particular area mean it is difficult to recruit and retain staff with the appropriate skills/experience. Any market supplement payments are temporary and must be agreed in accordance with the council’s market pay supplement policy. Where warranted, such payments will continue. Market supplements are reviewed annually.

12. First Aid

This is paid to individuals who volunteer to be first aiders for the purposes of their workplace and where it is not a requirement of their job role. Individuals must have a First Aid at Work qualification and be the nominated first aider for that location. The rate of payment is £8.67 per month.

13a Managing a reduction in contractual pay
Employees who will experience a reduction in contractual pay as a result of the implementation of the allowance changes will be eligible for a compensatory payment to support the change of their contract of employment. The level of payment for any will be determined as follows:

Amount of Loss

Brighton & Hove City Council's compensation package for pay cuts, 7th May 2013

There will be conditions attached to the compensatory payments and employees who chose to accept the new contract and compensatory payment will be required to sign a compromise agreement.

The compromise agreement will set out the conditions for the acceptance of the compensatory payment in detail but it will include that:

  • The council can reclaim 25% of the value of the payment if an individual leaves within a year of the implementation of the new terms and conditions.
  • The individual waives the right to bring claims against the council for unfair dismissal, redundancy, unlawful deduction of wages and other benefits, unfavourable treatment of part-time workers and/or fixed-term workers, equal pay or breach of contract, amongst other things.

13b Managing a reduction in travel expenses

Employees will be offered a compensatory payment equivalent to the annual essential user lump sum where this is part of their current contract.

Where employees have a protected entitlement to an essential user lump sum or other car or travel payments they will be offered the equivalent of three months payments as a lump sum payment.

These compensatory payments will have the same conditions attached to them as
set out in paragraph 13a above.

14. Pension Protections

If pensionable pay is reduced employees have the following option for the calculation of their final pay for pension purposes.

This option is available only to employees who experience a reduction in the pensionable pay within ten years of their last day as an active member of the local government pension scheme for that particular employment. The employee can choose their total average annual pensionable pay from any three consecutive years ending 31 March, within the period of thirteen years ending with the last day the employee is an active member of the pension scheme.

If an employee wishes to take advantage of this option he/she needs to write to the Pension Fund Administrator at least one month before leaving the relevant employment.

Employees cannot make use of this option to use earlier years’ pay in working out benefits if the reduction or restriction was as a result of the loss of a temporary increase in pay, or resulted from a reduction in grade in order to take retirement benefits on flexible retirement.

15. Existing Protection Arrangements (excluding car/travel protections – see paragraph 13b)

Existing protections currently in place and being paid for up to three years in accordance with the council’s Organisation Change Management Framework will continue in accordance with that scheme.

16. Job Families

Background

Last year the council made a commitment in its People Strategy to introduce Job Families for all NJC employees. This was endorsed by P&R Committee in February 2013.

Job Families were successfully implemented for school support staff some years ago and we are now in the early stages of designing a Job Families Framework for the rest of the council. We will consult fully on the model and process for implementation in the coming months. (Note: this consultation will be separate from the current consultation exercise on the allowance package.)

Why are we doing this now?

It would not be rational to modernise the system of pay without also looking at how we organise job groups and develop staff in similar roles. Implementing Job Families alongside changes to pay will lead to a clearer, more modern structure that supports delivery of the council’s priorities in the future.

What is a Job Family?
A Job Family is a group of jobs with similar characteristics and which are engaged in similar work (eg administrative roles) represented by generic role profiles describing the key work activities together with the skills, knowledge and
experience required at each level.

What are the benefits of Job Families?
Introducing Job Families is designed to provide a range of benefits for employees, managers and the organisation as a whole. These include:

  • Workforce flexibility; financial constraints and customer and client expectations mean there will be an ongoing need to redesign services. Job Families provide for greater flexibility of the workforce across the organisation and greater opportunities for development and employment across services, including redeployment opportunities.
  • Clear progression pathways for employees; feedback from staff consultation has shown that a high and increasing proportion of employees believe that opportunities for progression are not clear. Job Families enable us to define the requirements to progress to a higher level, and encourage lateral progression to different service areas.
  • Streamlined job evaluation; as with allowances, over time the number of individually defined and evaluated job roles has grown and now stands at over 1500 unique jobs. The current system of job evaluation is therefore cumbersome and expensive to manage. A more appropriate framework of around 140 role profiles is being developed to reflect the council’s major work activities and specialist functions, and to support more efficient organisation design.
  • Employee development: Job Families make it easy to define the competencies and skills required at each level in a family group and enable skills, knowledge and behavioural frameworks and development programmes to be tailored to suit each family.

When will Job Families be implemented?

We are currently working with managers on the number, levels and content of job family groups. Once we have a set of proposals we will be formally presenting these to the trade union.

What can I do now to understand what the impact may be?

You should make yourself familiar with your rota or the allowances you claim/are paid. Please have a look at the examples below that may help you understand the potential impact on your pay.

The council will also publish an automatic allowance calculator on the wave which will allow employees to enter basic details about their working pattern and will then calculate your potential total salary.

Example 1 – Night Working

Kemala Hayek is a scale 4 Care Officer on SCP 19, her hourly rate is £9.2272. She works 14 hours a week between the hours of 8pm and 6am. Under the new allowance scheme she can claim for 14 hours at 1/3 of her hourly rate in addition to her basic hourly rate.

To calculate this, first of all divide her hourly rate by 3.

£9.2272 ÷ 3 = £3.0754

We then multiply this figure by the number of hours that she works at night

£3.0754 x 14 = £43.06

Therefore Kemala will earn an additional £43.06 per week for working between the hours of 8pm and 6am.

Example 2 – Working Nights on a Saturday/Sunday

Ravi Srivastav is a Scale 3 Night Security Officer on SCP 17, his hourly rate is £8.7234. He works a 12 hour shift on a Saturday night starting at 8pm and finishing at 8am.

Under the new allowance scheme he will be able to claim for 10 hours at 1/3 of his hourly rate for working at night, and also 12 hours at half time for working on Saturday night and Sunday morning.

To calculate this, first of all divide the hourly rate by 3.

£8.7234 ÷ 3 = £2.9078

Because Ravi is working 10 hours during which the night rate applies we can do the following:

£2.9078 x 10 = £29.08

Then we need to work out the hourly rate for the weekend working part of the
shift, therefore divide the hourly rate by 2, therefore:

£8.7234 ÷ 2 = £4.3617

Because Ravi is working 12 hours over the weekend we can do the following:

£4.3617 x 12 = £52.34

Now we have the amounts for each allowance we just add the two amounts
together:

£29.08 + £52.34 = £81.42

Therefore Ravi will earn £81.42 for his night shift on a Saturday night.

Example 3 – Saturday/Sunday Working

Lucy Jones is a Scale 1/2 Kitchen Assistant on SCP 13, her hourly rate is
£8.0050. She works 3 hours every weekend.

Under the new allowance scheme she will be entitled to claim an enhancement of half time on her hourly rate in addition to her basic hourly rate.

To calculate this we do the following:

£8.0050 ÷ 2 = £4.0025

Because Lucy works 3 hours on the weekend, to work out the addition to her salary we do the following:

£4.0025 x 3 = £12.0075.

Therefore Lucy will earn an additional £12.0075 per week for working 3 hours at the weekend.

Example 4 – Bank Holiday Working

John Brown is a Scale 5 Home Care Support Worker on SCP 25, his hourly rate is £10.1701. He is contracted to work 5 bank holidays a year at 7.4 hours per bank holiday.

Under the new allowance scheme he will be entitled to claim double time on top of his normal hourly rate, or claim a time off in lieu. For the purpose of this example we shall assume that he would rather get paid double time on top of his normal hourly rate.

To calculate how much he gets per year for those bank holidays we first of all multiply his hourly rate by 2 as its double time, therefore:

£10.1701 x 2 = £20.3402

This gives his hourly rate for the bank holidays, then, we multiply that by the number of hours in the bank holiday which as above is 7.4 hours, therefore:

£20.3402 x 7.4 = £150.51748

This gives the amount he will earn per bank holiday.

Example 5 – Overtime Working

Piotr Wojcik is a scale 6 Team Leader on SCP 28, therefore his hourly rate is £12.2885. He has worked 12 hours of overtime over the course of a week.

To calculate the amount he can expect to receive, firstly calculate the hourly rate he will receive for the overtime hours he has worked, as all overtime is paid at time and a half the following calculation is done:

£12.2885 x 1.5 = £18.433

Now that his hourly rate has been calculated we can multiply this by the number of hours overtime he has worked:

£18.433 x 12 = £221.196.

Therefore Piotr will receive an additional £221.20 in his salary for the week in which he worked this overtime.

What happens now?

If you have any questions about the consultation exercise or your particular position, raise this through your line manager in the first instance.

Managers will be told who is likely to be affected by the proposals.

Your manager will then arrange a one to one meeting with to go through the details and feedback you may have.

If you are not affected by the changes, we would still welcome your feedback.

Questions and Answers

Didn’t we introduce a new pay and grading system in January 2010 after the Single Status review? Why are we talking about pay modernisation again? We introduced a robust system of job evaluation at that time and many staff were affected by changes to their basic pay. However, we didn’t make changes to allowances and additional payments and we now need to finish off the work that was started to make sure all of our pay and our terms and conditions are clear and consistent.

Why can’t we leave allowances and additional payments as they are? Our current arrangements have emerged over many years for a wide range of reasons. This means that they are complex, historic and costly to administer. We need a system that is consistent, modern and transparent.

Is this about saving money?

No. While some local authorities are looking at making changes to pay or terms and conditions to reduce costs, this does not apply to us. Of course we need to make sure our pay system is affordable but we are not looking to make reductions on our overall pay bill.

What’s the timetable?
May – early August 2013: Consultation Period
August 2013: Union meetings and feedback from consultation
September 2013: Offers made to staff
1 October 2013: Implementation of new allowance system

Timescales may change depending on the final feedback and discussions with the unions.

When will I know whether this affects me?

The negotiations are focused on allowances as we want to introduce a payment scheme that applies to everyone, that is transparent and also easy to administer. Our aim is to minimise as far as possible the number of people who may lose some pay. We expect most staff won’t see a change to their pay and some will see an increase.

We will keep you informed and when we make the final offer, you will have the chance to discuss how this affects you and your pay.

What does ‘introducing job families’ mean?
At the same time as reviewing allowances and additional payments we want to introduce job families. We made a commitment to do this in our People Strategy. At the moment there are over 1500 different job roles in the council, we think this is too many. A simpler system would make it easier for people to move around the council to different roles and we could plan a better learning and development programme for staff.

What will happen if negotiations cannot reach a conclusion?

We’ve set aside several weeks for negotiations which should give all parties sufficient time to explore all options. We are optimistic that we can find an agreeable way forward.

Why are senior management handling the negotiations, not the elected members?

At Policy and Resources Committee, members agreed the principles and parameters for the negotiations and authorised the chief executive and directors to implement a modernised pay and terms and conditions package in accordance with the law. A negotiating team has been appointed by the chief executive for this purpose.

Why are the negotiations confidential?

The union representatives and officers who are party to the negotiations will be discussing a wide range of ideas and options as they work towards modernising allowances, including the impact they could potentially have on different groups of staff. These are ‘collective’ negotiations on behalf of all staff and it would not be appropriate to play out every option publicly as many ideas will be discarded for better options through discussion and negotiation. At the end of negotiations both the council and the unions will be able to share where we’ve got to with all staff.

Email sent to Brighton & Hove City Council staff about their pay

This is an email sent by Brighton & Hove City Council to its staff with regard to its attempt to comply with equalities legislation and to reduce the complexity of pay categories. This email was sent at 2:38pm today and was entitled, “Pay and Allowances Modernisation – The Employer Offer.” Each member of staff is expected to work out how their own pay will be affected. This offer was verbally communicated to the staff unions a few days ago, with the result that the GMB declared itself now in official dispute with the Council because some of its members will have their pay cut. The GMB says that some of its members will lose £95 per week. This evening there is an extraordinary general meeting of Brighton & Hove Green Party, to debate a single resolution, which in broad terms supports the GMB.

Dear colleague

Pay and Allowances Modernisation

I am writing to you today to share the details of the offer that we have made as part of the recent negotiations on our proposed allowances and expenses scheme. Our purpose is to have a single set of allowances and expenses that are consistently paid across our workforce.

We have been negotiating with a clear aim of achieving the best and most affordable offer while keeping any losses to a minimum. We have now agreed with the unions that we should tell all staff about the proposals on changes to allowances and expenses. It’s important that you understand the whole offer and work out how, or if, you will be affected by the changes.

While I recognise that there is never a good time for change and that the economic challenges that we are facing are difficult, we can’t put this off any longer and we cannot continue to do nothing. I believe that the proposals reflect a genuine best offer that is fair, consistent and affordable. We presented this offer to GMB and Unison this week and are now starting a formal 90 day consultation with you.

Our proposals are:

  • Our normal working week will be 37 hours
  • Hours worked at weekends, as part of your normal working week will be paid at half time in addition to the normal hourly rate
  • Hours worked after 8pm and before 6am will be paid at a third time in addition to the normal hourly rate
  • Hours worked on a bank holiday, as part of your normal working week will, in addition to normal pay for the day, be paid at an enhanced rate of double time or at time plus an additional day off
  • All authorised overtime, over 37 hours per week, will be paid at a rate of time and a half; overtime on bank holidays will be at double time.
  • Payment for stand by duties will be £26.50 for up to a 24 hour period and payment for a sleep-in duty will be £32.94.  There are no changes to winter gritting standby and duty rates
  • All business mileage will be paid at 45p per mile for cars, 24p per mile for motorbike and 20p per mile for bicycles
  • Special Schools Allowance will continue
  • First aid volunteer payments will continue
  • Claims for subsistence can be made for overnight stays outside the city
  • Market supplements will be paid in accordance with our current policy
  • Acting up and ex-gratia payments will be paid in accordance with our current policies

 Any current allowances or payments not mentioned above will cease.

Your manager will be arranging briefings with you and you can read more in a detailed copy of the proposals available on the Wave or in paper form. There are four staff meetings taking place on Thursday. You are welcome to go along to one to find out more.

10am – Hove Town Hall banqueting suite and Brighton Town Hall council chamber

1pm – Hove Town Hall banqueting suite and meeting room 1 at the Brighton Centre

If the proposals affect you directly, your line manager will arrange a one to one meeting with you to discuss the details. Many of our staff will not be affected by these changes. I would urge everyone to take the time to look at the offer in more detail. 

There are some groups of staff who stand to gain financially through the changes but there are also some that lose. I know that this will be disappointing and worrying for those who will see an overall loss in pay as a result of these changes. We have made sure that our proposals include compensation for those staff affected. The negotiations were never about making savings and the offer is slightly more expensive overall to the council but will be more efficient and cost effective over time. It will help greatly towards becoming the modern 24/7 council that we are aspiring to be.

We welcome your feedback on the offer which you can do through your one to one with your manager, to your head of service or by email to [email address redacted].  Likewise if you have any further questions, you can ask the same people.

Once the consultation period is over, we will meet again with the unions and I will contact you with more information.

Regards

Penny Thompson

Chief Executive

The final fascist “March for England” in Brighton

Yesterday various fascist groups mustered their followers with the intention of frightening the good people of Brighton on a sunny St George’s Day. This was their fourth visit to my home town and, arguably, the most disastrous for them so far. Their numbers were few, their march was pathetic, they were massively outnumbered by counter-protesters. Following the fiasco of the 2012 March for England, Sussex Police adopted a different strategy, namely to separate the visiting fascists from the local counter-protesters. As yesterday’s sunny afternoon turned into a chilly evening, the police were congratulating themselves on a successful operation. From a purely policing point of view, it appeared better than last year, when they found themselves overwhelmed by the numbers of anti-fascists, lost control of their plan for the day and even failed to arrest one fascist thug whom they had wrestled to the ground.

However, that superficial analysis breaks down when the facts on the ground are examined more closely. With a helicopter, approximately 700 officers, some mounted, three dozen riot vans and various roads sealed off with large metal barricades which would be the envy of any commercial event, their advance preparation was better organised. They arranged low level barricades, behind the bannister on the sea front, into a chain of pens which were slow and cumbersome to climb over. Presumably the idea was that the anti-fascists could not disrupt the march by bursting through that dead zone. Unfortunately, the police couldn’t easily cross the barrier either. Despite declaring in advance that protesters would not be tolerated outside their various designated zones, when known fascists entered the anti-fascist zones, the police could not enter it to contain them. I witnessed a group of six flag waving fascists at 12:53pm well inside the anti-fascist zone (opposite the Thistle Hotel). Local people called across to the police to remove them but for several minutes the police just stood around as if they were little more than lollipop men. I shouted over a request that they deal with the situation but the response was, “Stop shouting!” After many requests one police officer wandered over to his side of his barricade and asked the fascists to climb over it. Looking somewhat reluctant, he put a foot on the railing and said, “Are you going to climb out or do I have to climb in?” The fascists argued with him. He did not climb in. Two protest liaison officers were eventually seen strolling up towards the illegal immigrants, as if they had all the time in the world. They were escorted away but not, so far as I can tell, arrested.

Sussex Police barriers between the beach and the seafront road on Sunday 21st April 2013

Bad luck if that’s your bicycle

This incident was repeated several times before the fascist march began. On the one occasion I witnessed when the police did climb across their barrier, it looked like a training exercise performed by Dad’s Army. When Sussex Police sat down to plan their day (Operation Wheeler), did they not ask themselves how they would cross their own barrier if they needed to?

Prior to the march beginning, known fascists were allowed to wander freely around town, waving flags and chanting “Eng-ger-land”. This behaviour is indistinguishable from their method of protest on their official march. Therefore, it is fair to call it protesting. Yet they do not seem to have been arrested for it. At 1:12pm two flag waving fascists managed to squeeze through a gap between two of the blue police vans shown above so that they could confront the hundreds of people occupying the roads to the North of the roundabout by the Palace Pier. They were pushed back by mounted officers fairly swiftly. Were they arrested? I don’t know, but Sussex Police should be able to answer that question.

More worryingly, no-one in Sussex Police seems to have thought about any form of public address system. With 150 uncooperative fascists and 3,000 angry locals to deal with, the police left themselves with no method to communicate with large parts of the crowd. Instead they seemed to rely on officers barking orders to whoever was in the mood to listen. At one point I found myself in conversation with several of the local councillors and the MP for Brighton Pavilion, Caroline Lucas, all of whom were were protesting against the fascists. One of them informed me that the police had promised them that they would have a public address system. Why was this promise broken? Surely it could not have been for want of financial resources?

Perhaps that last question should be directed to Katy Bourne, the Conservative Party Sussex Police and Crime Commissioner. She is in charge of allocating the resources for Sussex Police. Every section of Brighton’s political and social community declared its opposition to the fascists, except the Conservative Party. Sadly, the local Tories spent most of 2011 and much of 2012 concentrating their fire power on whipping up hatred against Traveller groups living on the fringes of the city, with the result that they were widely accused of racism. Their silence on this year’s arrival of the blatant racists echoed their failure to comment the year before. The combination of their refusal to condemn racism on our streets, their encouragement of racist attitudes and one of them now running the police is exactly what people most feared when the Police and Crime Commissioner posts were created. With each step, the police look increasingly politicised. Of course there are some sections of society which will never trust the police. The tragedy is that now many of us, who previously were prepared to accept that policing is a complicated job, now distrust the police because of this politicisation. The Tories tell us that operational decisions remain purely in the hands of the Chief Constable but he can no longer be regarded as independent when a politician has the power to fire him and hire someone else. The Tories could easily have condemned the so-called March for England. That they didn’t must have been a deliberate decision. It sits uncomfortably with the kindly manner the police treated the fascists in comparison to the locals.

I arrived at the seafront hours before the march began. The first thing I did was ask a policeman with a camera to photograph me and take a note of my identity. I explained that I done the same thing the year before and that, consequently, the police had been able to safely ignore various unfounded allegations made against me online because they knew that the fascists had identified someone else as me (someone who threw an empty plastic water bottle). This year the policeman I spoke to refused. I was struck by them failing to understand my request. I had to explain it and the reasons for it three times. The officer with the camera told me, “We are only photographing people where a crime is committed or there is a risk to public order.” I suggested that, as with the year before, police time need not be wasted if they photographed me again. This generated a different response, “We’ve got a problem with our batteries and cannot take too many pictures.” Police officers should tell the truth, so it’s fair to presume that this wasn’t some petty lie to get me to go away. That’s another question for Katy Bourne to answer. She can talk to the officer who refused to photograph me because his colleague allowed me to photograph his number instead:

A police officer in Brighton, 21st April 2013

Luckily I didn’t have a battery problem

Later on, another police officer with a camera photographed me when I suggested to the fascists, through my megaphone, that having turned around to march back to the Palace Pier, they were now facing Mecca. Then I played them the Call To Prayer, which they didn’t seem to enjoy but with hundreds of police and their barrier separating us, it couldn’t possibly have been described as a threat to public order.

After the march, the police allowed some fascists to roam around town looking for fights, just like last year. Predictably, there were outbursts of violence around the town well into the evening. Some people blame the violence on Antifa, who were out in strength. However, Antifa only exist to prevent the fascists from taking to the streets. They don’t demonstrate on their own. Had the fascists not been given a licence to demonstrate wherever they wanted, there would have been no trouble. They were even escorted to a bar in West Street to enjoy a drink! The police showed the Antifa activists little mercy and repeatedly attacked them. At one point one of them was wrestled to the ground because he refused to take off a face mask. Yet I saw plenty fascists covering their faces. Again, it is now very hard not to see the police as a politically motivated force, much as they were in the Thatcher years. Further proof of police bias to the far right comes from the fact that Sussex Police paid for at least one coach to bus the fascists to the start of the march. I’ve been on plenty of demonstrations in my time but I never heard of the police sorting out protesters’ travel arrangements before. This is another question for Katy Bourne to address.

On the plus side, Brightonians excelled themselves in their mockery of the fascism. Unsatisfied with screaming abuse, all manner of creative counter-protest dominated the day. The top prize for sheer good humour goes to the new EDL. If you follow that link, you’ll see that it doesn’t go to the racist English Defence League but instead to the English Disco Lovers. Already they are close to their stated aim of being the first result in online searches for the EDL. Their disco danced its way along the seafront all day and proved the value of good humour as a challenge to hatred. After some of the fascists had been bussed out of the town centre by the police, I went off to speak to them. It would be inappropriate to reveal the details of that conversation now but suffice it to say that we can be confident the fascists will not dominate St George’s Day in Brighton next year. 2013 was their final march. Watch this space and the EDL website for more information. The English Disco Lovers appear at 0:53 in this video:

Yesterday should have seen all of Brighton united against fascism. Of course, no-one could have been surprised by the Tories’ attitude but the real shock of the day was seeing the local Labour Party’s official tweeter attempt to make political capital out of the fact that the Green Party administration of the City Council had previously declared itself supportive of the lawful right to protest. Early on in the afternoon, @BHLabour, tweeted, “Businesses closes and residents terrified as @BHGreens proclamation that we are a city of protest brings March for England to our city #labour

Brighton & Hove Labour Party tweet criticising the Green Party as if they welcomed fascists to Brighton. 21st April 2013

Brighton & Hove Labour Party’s official twitter account created division instead of unity

This tweet was met with a storm of protest from all sorts of people, including several prominent Labour Party members and local trades unionists, many of whom could not be described as sympathetic to the Green Party, such as Caroline Penn. Ever since 1936, whenever the fascists have taken to the streets in Britain, everyone else has put their differences aside and united against fascism. Aside from the nonsensical nature of the tweet (the fascists came to Brighton before the Greens won power in the city), much offence was caused by it. Who on earth was on Labour’s Sunday shift on twitter last week? It wasn’t just a single tweet. Here’s another, at 2:26pm.

Brighton & Hove Labour Party tweet, concentrating on division rather than unity against fascism. 21st April 2013

Another divisive tweet from the Brighton & Hove Labour Party

And another, at 3:48pm:

Brighton & Hove Labour Party tweet, concentrating on division rather than unity against fascism. 21st April 2013

Labour insists on division

The decision to allow the march was made purely by Sussex Police. There is no mechanism for a political party to “apply to have march banned.” It wasn’t just three divisive tweets. Here’s another at 4:44pm:

Brighton & Hove Labour Party tweet, concentrating on division rather than unity against fascism. 21st April 2013

Will Labour explain its policy on the law on protest?

Did the Labour Party ask Sussex Police to ban the fascist march? No, they did not. By 7:18pm, the local Labour Party seemed to have come to its senses. It offered this apology:

An apology from Brighton & Hove Labour Party for creating division instead of building unity against fascim. 21st April 2013

Brighton & Hove Labour Party makes first apology

Some people complained that this apology appeared to attempt to shift the blame onto those offended. Seeing the logic of that, Labour offered another apology, at 7:46pm:

False claim that Brighton & Hove Labour Party had removed offending tweet. 21st April 2013

Brighton & Hove Labour Party falsely claimed that it had removed offending tweets

At the time of writing this blog post, the first tweet has been removed but the three subsequent tweets, shown above, which make similar points and cannot be described as in the spirit of unity are still on twitter, for all the world to see. The Brighton & Hove Labour Party has a proud tradition of opposing fascism. It has long been involved in anti-fascist movements and must understand what unity means. Its insistence on abandoning unity against fascism is a very sad development indeed. Recently the local Labour Party suspended one of its local councillors (Anne Meadows). Will it now suspend its twitterers, who have chosen to create division rather than unite against fascism?

Ringing a hollow bell

The Brighton & Hove Green Party is dusting off its ballot boxes right now and settling down to an uneasy autumnal evening, following the unconvincing victory of Jason Kitcat in the so-called Green Group Convenor elections. Outsiders may find an election with only one candidate something of a confused concept. To win his uncontested election, Mr Kitcat had simply to win more votes than the option to re-open nominations.

The actual election results have not been officially published, not even inside the party, on the grounds that, “This manipulation precludes the publication of numerical votes cast.” The manipulation referred to is the Green Party’s electoral college, which divides the votes of ordinary party members and elected councillors, so that each group gets 50% of the total vote. Last year’s surge in those asking to re-open nominations rather than elect Mr K has been repeated. Why doesn’t the leadership doesn’t want its own membership to see the results? As political bells come and go, this one rings more hollow than most:

Members in public office
	Jason Kitcat 12
	RON 11
Other members
	Jason Kitcat 65
	RON 38

Members in public office includes Keith Taylor, the local Green MEP, Caroline Lucas, the local Green MP and, of course, Christina Summers, even though she has been expelled from the Green Group of councillors. Obviously, two didn’t vote. Here’s the clanger: at least one councillor did not receive a ballot paper at all. A definite re-opener as it happens. Although this missing ballot paper would not have affected the final result, it does mean that half of the elected political leadership voted against Jason Kitcat. A number of scenarios now present themselves.

The conventional scenario would be that the whole group pull together, sort out their differences and go into the next local elections on a proud record. The Greens rarely do conventional.

A likely outcome is that some of those who might otherwise have picked up the reigns of administrative office, decide to step back. That’s less committee members walking the talk. That’s more Green councillors getting back to the membership too but it will put a unique strain on a young Council.

Another possibility is that some Greens form a rebel group on the council, thus depriving Mr Kitcat of his Convenorship of the largest party status. Thus, the half of the Green Group who appeared to be willing to risk anyone but the present Council Leader, could see him being deprived of that. That path would also create the bizarre situation whereby the Tories run the city, because the split would most probably leave the political groups as follows: Tories ~ 18, Greens ~ 16, Labour ~ 13, Other Greens ~ 6, Independent ~ 1. It is unlikely that the present Tories could anything other than hang themselves with the incompetence rope. 18 is way to few to manage the city, just as 22 is tough for the Greens now.

Whatever happens in high office, on the ground fissures of that magnitude do not inspire activists to recruit, to raise funds, to deliver newspapers… there is no room for celebration in the Green Party tonight. The Left and Dark Green wings of the party are whispering instead about roots activism, of personal causes, of lost dreams. Many of the party’s best activists are about to just walk away. Who will ring the bell then?

The ballad of Jason and Ron and the cat

Although people who join the Greens find none of the rumoured tree hugging rituals, some distinctive working peculiarities do present themselves. There’s the emphasis on openness, so that anyone may attend the party’s monthly meetings, party member or not. There’s the surprisingly effective silent minute of “attunement” to keep the purpose of a meet. There’s the candidate for every election called Ron, always standing without a surname. Ron’s phantom identity reveals much about the Green Party’s democratic approach. Ron stands for “Re-Open Nominations.

Desiring the fairest representation, the Greens took external expert advice. Ron stands as a candidate for the sometimes very many people who might otherwise remain a silent majority. In all parties, trades unions, clubs, et cetera very many fine candidates do not want to put themselves forward against an incumbent because they do not wish to appear to be responsible for breaking up the party, so to speak. In most parties, once someone has become that party’s elected MP for a certain constituency or councillor for a certain ward, they remain that party’s candidate until the electorate chooses someone else (scandals excepting).

The phantom Ron, the one for all, is facing down the ballot’s second player, Jason Kitcat, now. We’ll come to the cat later. Six days ago nominations closed for the post of Green (Councillors) Group Convenor. An election has begun (it ends at Noon, 23rd March 2013). Basically, the winner becomes the Council Leader but if you want the specifics, read through the turgid bullets below. The direct responsibilities include:

  • Membership Governance Committee
  • Joint Membership Budget Review Panel
  • Regular personal briefings with Chief Executive
  • Strategic direction – setting, review, monitoring & forward planning
  • Media overview and delivery
  • Managing work priorities of Political Assistant
  • Maintaining during an electoral period an on-call rota of members available for service on an Electoral Disciplinary Panel

The shared responsibilities include:

  • Liaison on agenda setting
  • Policy – co-ordination, delivery, & review
  • Mentoring the Green Group

Mr Kitcat is once again the only corporeal name in the game, as he was a year ago, when he first won in the Green Convenor electoral college. Councillors get 50% of the votes, the ordinary membership the rest. Here are the results from last year’s Convenor election:

  • Jason Kitcat 80 Members (1,520 weighted), 11 councillors (990 weighted) TOTAL WEIGHTED 2510 (73.39%)
  • Ron 10 Members (190 weighted), 8 councillors (720 weighted), TOTAL WEIGHTED 910 (26.61%)

Although Mr Kitcat’s failure to command the support of more than half of the Green Group is notable, the real story is the record breaking number of ballots cast for Ron. The highest vote for Ron in a decade, at least. That’s let the cat out of the bag and quite right too, it was cruel.

That was a year ago, after Mr Kitcat had sported the Financial feathers for the first year in office. Since then trust in him has deteriorated to the point where for the first time ever, an actual campaign for Ron is in progress.

Councillors and activists, preparing the campaign, believe, with some justification, that any such rival that they would prefer will be characterised as being of the Deep Greens (or Hard Left) and is, therefore, also unlikely to defeat the incumbent Mr Kitcat. However, they believe that the majority of the party want a different Convenor, begging the question as whether there is a third potential candidate ready, willing and able to step up to the plate, should Ron win. The answer to that there is at least one, possibly two such people. Both are unifying candidates.

As with any party, within the Green Group, there are councillors of different political emphases. There are those who, like Jason Kitcat once was, walk and quack like Liberal Democrats. Way over on the other side are people like Ben Duncan. For all, the key issue is that since the Green Group Convenor will become the Leader of the Council, it must be someone who unifies people, rather than divides them. Grinning your way through life as if Tony Blair had the last word in public relations is no substitute for acknowledging difficulties. Repeatedly failing to reply to enquiries, especially in the Green’s daily chat space, “Members Discuss,” doesn’t help either, given it being populated by the party’s activist backbone.

When challenged on one such issue, Mr Kitcat’s excused himself with unspecified “legal reasons“, which, unsurprisingly, he could not name. With deep financial uncertainty for many people, unnecessary suffering and distress has been caused to the very people who make the council work, as a consequence. Activists voted to make party policy the opposite of Mr Kitcat’s, declaring that if that policy continued, the Brighton and Hove Green Party would actively campaign against it. The mark of a chap with the party behind him?

The same meeting agreed to request the Council abolish the so-called bedroom tax for its own social tenants. Jason Kitcat voted against. A month later, word leaks out (in the blogosphere generally but here’s my report). Despite becoming the first local council in the the UK to introduce a practical measure to destroy a Government policy, its leader has stayed, at least until the time of writing (yesterday), publicly silent on the issue.

These are but two examples of the manner in which Mr Kitcat’s leadership has strayed from party policy. To heal divisions, their existence must be acknowledged. Read his election statement below to see if you can find that happening.

“This past year we have built on the great work Bill Randall did as Convenor the year before. There has been excellent progress in delivering our 2011 manifesto. We have improved the council which had been left drifting by the previous Conservative administration. Since May we have delivered the organisational change which has led to the appointment of a superb new chief executive, a fresh senior management team, a reduced high to low pay ratio and the rejection of the Intelligent Commissioning structure the Tories had left us with.

It is a testament to the work of all the Green Councillors and party members that so much has been achieved, and even more is in the pipeline. The council is soon to be an officially accredited Living Wage Foundation employer, it is also on course to be recognised as leading the world’s first One Planet City.

This year through the hard work of our Green Councillors our city has won unprecedented levels of government and international funding for projects especially biodiversity and boosting recycling, building on that already won for transport and the public realm. As a member of the Local Enterprise Partnership’s board I have lobbied to ensure the city has received more investment funding than any other area in the region including for the key ‘Block L’ development behind Brighton Station.

We have led and won the bid to government for ultrafast broadband in the city, and we will be installing free wifi in central parts of the city too. We have become a ‘Frack Free City’ this year and are in the short-list to host Rugby World Cup matches in 2015.

Working regionally I have shaped the agenda, bringing together neighbouring councils to win a ‘Greater Brighton’ City Deal from government, which by the end of this summer will bring devolved powers and new funding pots, the first being for cycling investment.

With colleagues I have been working to reshape and strengthen our partnerships with schools, the city’s public sector, local businesses and the third sector. Feedback from all has been incredibly positive and constructive. This has been backed by the CityTracker poll which shows growing confidence in the council’s services.

We have been vocal for Green values at local, national and international levels across all the broadcast and specialist media, at conferences, lobbying ministers and through the Local Government Association.

I have stood up to government repeatedly as they have rained down their awful policies. I have been speaking, writing and lobbying on key issues such as welfare cuts, and have often been able to persuade council leaders of all political persuasions to join me in doing so. Just over a year ago I was the first to speak out against Eric Pickle’s council tax freeze, winning a much cherished ‘Pinhead of the Month’ award from the ultra-right Tax Payers Alliance as a result. Despite my being ridiculed in Parliament by Pickles, today almost half of councils are rejecting the Tory freeze con trick, it was by following my lead that other councils broke the freeze.

My passionate leadership has been recognised over the year. With just six others I was shortlisted from hundreds of nominations for LGIU’s ‘Leader of the Year’ award. Out of 170 member cities, I was the only one of nine European City leaders invited to speak to the EuroCities annual conference and was one of only a handful admitted to the LGA’s annual leadership programme.

I am standing for the year ahead with Ian Davey and Lizzie Deane as a strong, collaborative convenor’s team. They have both been deputy convenors before, bringing a wealth of experience to the team. Whilst continuing to deliver on manifesto promises we will be focussed on improving the group’s dialogue with the party, external communications and media relations as we recognise there is much work to do there.

Greens have a unique vision for how local public services should be. We are in an incredible position to show that not only are we able to resist the worst of the government’s appalling austerity measures, but that we have positive policies that improve everyone’s quality of life, protects the environment and reduces inequality.

For continued Green leadership please vote for me and our team.”

No-one, bar none, failed to get along with Bill Randall, the previous Convenor. Widely respected across the city, he took on the nightmarish task of unexpectedly winning power in the city with an aplomb which denied the difficulty of it all. Bill gave way to Jason, just as the Greens have frequently cycled through candidates, councillors and the like. They don’t really do that, “me, me, me,” thing. It’s more “tree, tree, tree” (sorry). For a small party (approximately 7,000 members nationally) to have an MEP, 150 or so councillors, an MP and control of a famously exciting city, its methodology is demonstrably efficient.

Their refusal to have a whip means unity is got with good working interpersonal relationships. It isn’t that hard, with only 22 councillors. There’s a fair few of them who can easily manage the brief. Many of them go back years.

With two years to go before an election, the capital Green Party project hinges on on this moment. If Mr Kitcat hangs on in, as the project manager, will more of the activists grow sceptical, wondering what their effort is for? Already, tens of thousands of the party’s local newspaper, GreenLeaf, lay undelivered around the city.

The Green Party will do best by doing what it does best. Witness the recent incident of the tree at Seven Dials, just inside our Leader’s ward. Labour stands by, aghast, befuddled and spinning, whilst the Greens dominate both sides of the debate, as it were. Now it very much looks as if the tree could be saved with the Greens agreeing with one another again. But there will be a next time, followed by more of the same, with discord and deserters.

It isn’t a ballad, it’s a ballot. The Greens didn’t get this far to lament but to leave a legacy, at least. It’ll be made or broken on the outcome of this election. It depends whether they want Ron to break out the election and make way for a team player, including the cat, or to stake all on the brass plate policy diktat of Mr Kitcat.